Wayne Couzens deserves “decades in jail”, his barrister has told a court in England in the former police officer’s appeal against his whole-life prison sentence.
The former Pc was handed a whole-life term last year for the rape and murder of 33-year-old Sarah Everard after he abducted her in south London on March 3rd, 2021.
It was the first time the sentence had been imposed for a single murder of an adult not committed in the course of a terror attack.
On Wednesday, senior judges heard challenges or appeals to the prison sentences of five killers, including the whole-life terms of Couzens and double murderer Ian Stewart.
A bearded Couzens, wearing a grey jumper, appeared by video-link from HMP Frankland at the start of the hearing for his appeal against his whole-life term.
Members of Ms Everard’s family were present in the Royal Courts of Justice as his appeal was discussed.
Jim Sturman QC, for Couzens, said: “Mr Couzens accepts that his crimes are abhorrent and nothing I say in any way is intended to minimise them or to minimise the impact of these crimes on Sarah Everard’s family and huge circle of friends.”
He told the court that it was accepted that Couzens deserved “decades in jail” but argued a whole-life term was excessive.
Mr Sturman added: “The combination of his remorse and his guilty pleas… should balance out that aggravating factor which clearly exists, of him being a police officer, albeit off-duty in half uniform.”
The barrister told the court that Couzens was unique out of the 64 people currently serving whole life orders.
He said in written submissions: “Whilst this may well be considered by the public and the court to be a case of equal seriousness to a political, religious, or ideological murder, it is not such an offence, not does it fall into any other category listed in the schedule.”
Mr Sturman later argued that police officers are not unique in being able to detain people, giving an example of a teacher able to detain vulnerable pupils.
He concluded: “A lot of very unique and very horrible cases come before the court…. but in our respectful submission, the court should think long and hard and step back from a whole-life order in this case.”
Tom Little QC, representing the Attorney General’s Office (AGO) and Crown Prosecution Service, said Couzens’ offending was of the “utmost seriousness”, adding: “His criminality was, as found by the judge, a fundamental attack in reality on our democratic way of life.”
“A police officer is in a uniquely powerful position,” Mr Little said.
Mr Little said the sentencing judge had provided a “clear and coherent justification” for the sentence that he imposed.
“The judge was entitled to form the view that he did in relation to a lack of genuine contrition,” he added.
Mr Little concluded: “The whole-life order was the right sentence to impose in this wholly exceptional case.”
