Peers have overwhelmingly backed the suspension of Kenneth Maginnis from the UK House of Lords for at least 18 months for the bullying and harassment of three MPs and a security guard.
Members voted by 408 to 24, majority 384, to support the sanction recommended by the Lords Conduct Committee.
While the report’s findings would ordinarily have been rubberstamped, it went to a vote after calls from a number of peers.
Mr Maginnis, the ex-MP for Fermanagh and South Tyrone, was investigated after being “verbally abusive” to security officer Christian Bombolo when asked to show his parliamentary pass in January.
Mr Bombolo told Lords standards commissioner Lucy Scott-Moncrieff the incident had left him feeling “humiliated” and “worthless”, adding: “I lost my esteem, my dignity.”
Oppose
Analysis of the division list showed 12 Tory peers voted against the sanction, including former Commons deputy speaker Michael Lord, ex-minister Peta Buscombe and former MEP Richard Balfe.
Others to oppose it included Mr Maginnis himself, Labour peer and former union leader Bill Jordan, former Ulster Unionist Party MP John Taylor and Democratic Unionist Party peers William McCrea and Maurice Morrow.
The recommendation by the peers’ standards watchdog follows an investigation into Mr Maginnis’s treatment of a parliamentary security officer and MPs Hannah Bardell, Luke Pollard and Toby Perkins, during which he was found to have used homophobic slurs.
The committee suggested his 18-month suspension could be extended if he does not undergo training and change his ways.
Introducing the report, conduct committee chairman and former Supreme Court justice Jonathan Mance said the issue of concern was “not Lord Maginnis’s beliefs but his behaviour”.
Lord Maginnis is entitled to hold the beliefs he does and to express them freely
He said: “Lord Maginnis is entitled to hold the beliefs he does and to express them freely… but at the same time he is required to treat others with courtesy and respect and not to engage in what were here repeated incidents of bullying and or harassing misconduct.
“It is of paramount importance that all members of the parliamentary community of all backgrounds, sexual orientation and beliefs and of any status should feel safe and respected when they come here to work.
“Bullying and harassment, such as that demonstrated by Lord Maginnis, must be subject to significant sanction to safeguard all members of the parliamentary community, and evidence is then required that the perpetrator understands why their behaviour is wrong and how it must change before they can be allowed back into Parliament.”
Normal workplace
Responding to the watchdog’s recommendation, the SNP’s Ms Bardell, who witnessed the incident with Mr Bombolo, said Mr Maginnis would have been “shown the door” in “any normal workplace”.
According to the committee’s report, she complained that when she attempted to intervene in the clash between the peer and the security guard, she was treated “rudely and aggressively” by Mr Maginnis, who later used “homophobic and derogatory language about her” in comments to the media.
At the time, the Huffington Post said Mr Maginnis referred to Ms Bardell as “queer” and accused her of gaining “cheap publicity” by raising the incident as a point of order in the Commons.
The Metropolitan Police confirmed in January, after the clash was made public, that it was investigating an allegation of hate crime at the House of Commons.
Mr Maginnis was an Ulster Unionist Party MP but in 2012 announced his decision to resign his membership after the leadership distanced themselves when he referred to gay marriage as “unnatural and deviant behaviour” and linked it to bestiality.
As part of the recent inquiry into his behaviour, he was also investigated for using homophobic language in relation to Mr Pollard in February this year after becoming disgruntled by the Labour MP’s chairing of a meeting of the Armed Forces All-Party Parliamentary Group.
Complaining about Mr Pollard’s conduct to chairman of the group James Gray MP, he sent an email with the subject heading “Discrimination by Homos”.
Shadow environment secretary Mr Pollard said in his complaint that he was “shocked and surprised that this type of behaviour would happen within Westminster” and said the email made him feel like a “victim of abuse”.
