Rishi Sunak has dug into the Tory civil war by accusing Boris Johnson of asking him to take action that “wasn’t right” in discussions over the former British prime minister’s honours list.
The prime minister said his predecessor and one-time Conservative ally asked him to “do something I wasn’t prepared to do” by overruling the panel that vets appointments to the House of Lords or to “make promises to people”.
“I didn’t think it was right and if people don’t like that, then tough,” Mr Sunak said on Monday in his first comments since Mr Johnson dramatically resigned as an MP.
An ally of Mr Johnson fired back by accusing Mr Sunak of having “secretly blocked” the peerages of former UK culture secretary Nadine Dorries and others.
The escalating war of words came after Downing Street published Mr Johnson’s resignation honours list on Friday without the names of his key allies, also including former Cop26 president Sir Alok Sharma and former minister Nigel Adams.
Hours later Mr Johnson announced that he would stand down as an MP, as the Privileges Committee investigating whether he lied to Parliament over partygate prepared to find that he had broken the rules and recommend a suspension which could trigger a by-election in his Uxbridge and South Ruislip constituency.
Mr Adams and Ms Dorries also said they were quitting the Commons, triggering three challenging by-elections for the prime minister as his party trails in the polls.
Publicly turning on the man he used to share Downing Street with, Mr Sunak suggested Mr Johnson wanted him to ignore the recommendations of the House of Lords Appointments Commission (Holac).
“Boris Johnson asked me to do something that I wasn’t prepared to do because I didn’t think it was right,” the Prime Minister said when asked after a speech at the London Tech Week conference.
“That was to either overrule the Holac committee or to make promises to people.
“Now, I wasn’t prepared to do that. I didn’t think it was right and if people don’t like that, then tough.”
Mr Sunak said he had vowed to “do things differently” when he entered No 10, adding: “And that’s what I’m doing.”
There have been claims that Mr Johnson reached a “gentleman’s agreement” with Mr Sunak that he would wave through the honours list and allow the MPs to be re-vetted by Holac at a later date so they would not have to stand down now.
But Mr Johnson’s camp has accused his successor of breaking the deal that has now enflamed tensions rather than buying a ceasefire in the hostilities.
An ally told the PA news agency: “Rishi secretly blocked the peerages for Nadine and others.
“He refused to ask for them to undergo basic checks that could have taken only a few weeks or even days.
“That is how he kept them off the list – without telling Boris Johnson.”
Holac, which Mr Johnson himself overruled while in No 10 over the peerage of Tory donor Peter Cruddas, has confirmed it did not support eight nominees put forward by the ex-leader.
UK government figures have insisted that neither Mr Sunak nor Downing Street removed names from Mr Johnson’s peerages submission.
UK Cabinet minister Michael Gove stressed on Monday that the “appropriate procedure” and the correct “precedent” was followed.
Downing Street took the decision on Saturday to declassify Holac chairman Lord Bew’s approved names to Mr Sunak.
The letter, dated February 5th, contains the seven peerages announced on Friday, along with a redacted name of a person who took the “personal decision to withdraw themselves”.
The Privileges Committee will meet on Monday to finalise and discuss the publication of its report into Mr Johnson, who has dismissed the investigation as a “witch hunt”.
The probe is thought to have ruled that Mr Johnson lied to Parliament when he told MPs Covid rules were followed in Downing Street despite boozy parties taking place while social distancing restrictions were in place.
Reports suggest the panel was set to recommend at least a 10-day suspension, reaching the threshold for a by-election to be potentially triggered in Mr Johnson’s west London seat.
Mr Johnson accused the committee of “bias” and likened it to a “kangaroo court”.
Mr Gove defended the integrity of the committee but refused to rebuke party colleagues during an appearance on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
“It is not my job or role to censor or police anyone’s views in a matter of public debate,” he said.
“I have respect for the work that they have done and I think that we need to respect again the integrity of the process and wait until the report is published before then debating its conclusions and the consequences.
“The second thing that I want to say is that I do deprecate the fact that they are now in a position where, as reported, they have to seek or have been granted additional security.”
